![]() |
Some More OK Cub Fun By Maris Dislers
Students of OK Cubs will tell you that the original .049 was soon out-performed by the opposition and had to be replaced beginning in 1952 by the lighter and more powerful Cub 049X, A and B models. Then in 1960, a further upgraded R version appeared with the cylinder re-designed to accept a glow head as per Cox engines, for more power. Since I’m a diesel man at heart, I wondered if I could convert one of those later Cub 049R engines to diesel with an after-market diesel head. Not easily as it turned out, because the outer edge of the conical piston crown sits somewhat lower than the head seat at Top Dead Center (TDC). The contra-piston would have to extrude some way out of the head into the cylinder bore for an acceptable diesel compression ratio.
If my supposition is on the mark, this hybrid is essentially a working representation of the very rare OK Cub .06 prototype diesel, albeit with a very different top end. The latter difference should not affect performance The piston fit on my engine was borderline by diesel standards, but the hybrid Cub started and ran fine using traditional fuel of equal parts ether, kerosene and castor oil, with .8% ignition improver added, providing that it wasn’t pushed to the point where the oil film sealing the piston fit faltered. Cub diesels like a fuel with a high oil content to compensate for the typical slightly leaky piston fit. Recently, thanks to Darcy Porritt, my hybrid received a slightly larger piston for improved compression seal. It is now a strong runner, starting easily with a light "dry" prime against the piston with closed exhausts and four drops of fuel in the venturi. Needle response is quite gradual, owing to the very slight taper on the needle. The needle is a bit hard to reach, but if set a little rich from the absolute peak it does not need readjustment when restarting. Compression adjustment is progressive. Hot restarts use the same priming routine. Overall, the engine is quite likeable.
If my little hybrid really does indicate the prototype Cub .06 diesel’s probable performance, it would explain why Herkimer’s Charles Brebeck waved the diesel wand over his .074 and .049B glowplug models, resulting in the OK production diesel engines. They easily out-performed their glow-plug equivalents and many of their competitors, but were out of step commercially with then-current market trends in the USA. Cub diesels didn’t get to UK and European markets where their merits would have been better appreciated, but E.D.’s 1960 Pep .8 cc diesel and Gordon Burford’s 1963 1.5 cc Taipan glow and diesel engines paid homage to the Cub design, as did the German Jaguar diesels. ____________________ Article © Maris Dislers, Glandore, South Australia First published November 2023
|
|