![]() |
The Mills 1.3 Marine Diesels By Maris Dislers
In 1948 Mills departed from their previous one-engine strategy. They diversified their range with new 0.75 cc and 2.4 cc offerings and an almost completely revised 1.3 cc model. With all of this going on, the new Mills 1.3 Marine engine which was advertised at the same time barely got a mention and is almost unknown now. I’m referring to the one with an aluminium crankcase, looking like a Mk. 2 magnesium-case Mills 1.3 but with screw holes under the exhaust area. Its very existence has confused some model engine collectors, as it doesn’t fit neatly into the broader narrative. In a separate article to be found on this website, Adrian and I have summarized the manner in which this model acquired its popular designation as the “Anniversary Model”. We’ve shown that this designation was undoubtedly the creation of an imaginative later collector rather than a name assigned by Mills Brothers. The truth is that this aluminium-case unit was actually the Mills 1.3 Marine unit released in June 1948. Mills Bros. themselves never referred to any “Anniversary Model”, nor did any reference to such amodel ever appear in the contemporary modelling media. The name is a later invention. If any reader can prove us wrong, please submit your evidence!
The engine only continued to appear in Watkins ads until January 1949, after which it quietly disappeared. Thereafter, the 1.3 Marine was mentioned as a one-liner in Mills advertisements in the January – May 1949 issues of “Aeromodeller”. The price was reduced to £5 5s 0d (£5.25) during this period. Little sales interest is implied ....... It seems that the marine engine was given its own serial number block - distinct (at that time) from the contemporary Mk. 2 aero engine. Known serial numbers ranging between 30002 and 30292 imply that this is by far the rarest of all Mills engine models. In his final installment of “The Mills Story” (Model Engine World, April 1996) Mike Noakes noted the Aeromodeller advert of December 1948, but did not associate the marine engine with the reputed “Anniversary Model”. His eagle eye spotted some later Mills adverts in November and December 1950 that included the 1.3 cc Marine unit “with fuel cut-out” selling for £4 2s 0d (£4.10). The engine appeared for the last time in the January 1951 issue. The complete absence of any contemporary listing of the marine engine or suitable boat kits in contemporary dealer adverts suggests that this represented a final token effort by Mills Bros. focused upon the Christmas 1950 season after a dismal previous sales performance. The Mills 1.3 Marine Model Described
It seems very likely that a significant stock of unused Mk. 1 aluminium crankcases remained when the magnesium-case Mills 1.3 Mk. 2 Series 1 was introduced. The idea of creating the marine engine was presumably hatched as a way of using up these left-over aluminium cases. The extra weight and lower power output of such a model was not important in marine service, while aluminium resists corrosion far better than the new magnesium alternative. This all fits in with the expanded range strategy as well as the Marine concept. To match the new Mills visual style, the aluminium crankcases were machined in the upper case “waistline”. There is evidence to suggest that the revised case machining was tried out initially by simply pulling a completed Mills 1.3 Mk. 1 out of the line and re-machining its previously numbered case – the confirmed existence of engine number 15682 having a case machined in this manner supports this view. That case was also bored out to accept a Mk. 2 crankshaft. Having proved the concept in this way, the decision was taken to proceed with the production of a series of marine models using re-machined left-over and now-redundant Mk. 1 cases.
The advertising confirms that a flywheel was fitted in place of the aero components normally featured. It’s unclear whether or not the Mills 1.3 Marine was supplied with a tank – such a fitting would appear redundant in model boat service, where a With use in model aircraft being overwhelmingly more popular among Mills users, most surviving examples of these engines are now “bare”, having lost their stacks and being retro-fitted with regular aero spinner nuts and tanks. The one shown in Mike Clanford’s “Pictorial A to Z” book (above left) is an example. The stacks would actually have been something of an encumbrance in a typical aero installation, which explains their absence from many examples. However, a few do retain the exhaust stubs as seen at the right, but the flywheel shape remains a mystery. No images of the original 1.3 Marine were published back in the day, nor are we aware of any currently-available images. Can any kind reader help with a photo of an authentic Mills Marine example? The one remaining question is whether or not the original Mills 1.3 Marine model was supplied with a water-cooled jacket. It appears significant in that regard to note that the December 1948 Mills Bros. advert referred to the Marine model as being supplied “complete with exhaust stubs and flywheel” – no mention of a water-cooled jacket. If one had been included, surely it would have been mentioned? The clincher seems to me to be the fact that the Henry J. Nicholls advertising categorized the engine as being “suitable for boats or cars”. Air cooling is clearly implied here. No surviving aluminium-case examples with water-cooled jackets are reported. Mills 1.3 development insights The Mills 1.3 Mk. 2 aero model has a deck height which is around 3 mm lower than that of the Mk. 1. Its connecting rod and piston skirt are also shorter by that amount. To preserve the original intake timing, its cylinder induction port is placed higher (in Mk. 2 Series 1 form) than in the Mk. 1. The Mk. 2 Series 1’s improved power output came from increased primary compression, lighter reciprocating mass and a stiffer conrod. Ending a product run is seldom neat ‘n tidy, and I assume that an excess inventory of unused aluminium 1.3 Mk. 1 crankcases was a key driver for the production of the marine engine. Remember that Mills cylinders and pistons were accurately finished, but not to a precise size, hence requiring selective fitting of parts to arrive at a good match. Even so, the inevitable small variations are largely responsible for the observed performance differences between examples of the same Mills model. It doesn’t take much imagination to suppose that suitable pistons were running out and that the assembler used the new, shorter pistons to complete the last few marine 1.3’s.
Stan Pilgrim’s aluminium-case Mills Marine 1.3 no. 30292 has a short piston that could have come from the factory, perhaps from the final Christmas 1950 batch to match the improved performance of the Mk. 2 Series 2 aero engine of 1950. To test our assumption, we fitted an Aurora 1.3 piston/cylinder of this specification to a Mills 1.3 Mk. 1 Series 2 and recorded maximum torque of 11.8 oz-in at 7,800 RPM and a peak output of 0.11 BHP around 10,000 RPM. Right up in the region of Adrian’s Mk. 2 Series 1 engine (which has a modified extended intake period) and any good Mills 1.3 Mk. 2 Series 2. Fitting a later piston/cylinder to a Mk. 2 Series 1 engine gives less improvement owing to the significant blanking of the intake port by the higher crankcase carburettor aperture. The Ripmax Marine Conversions
Descriptions of Ripmax Models
Two exhaust tubes of 5/16 in. diameter brass tubing are soldered to flanges. Each flange is retained by small screws engaging threaded holes in the crankcase fore and aft of the exhaust apertures. The cast venturi is not machined for the tank retaining screw or shut-off, implying that Ripmax intended the engine to run with an external fuel tank – a logical assumptionin model boat service. This semi-finished component was clearly supplied by Mills Bros. in cooperation with Ripmax. The drilled and t Since the smaller Mills .75 used flats on the crankshaft to lock the prop driver, the Ripmax conversion retains its prop driver. The brass The nickel-plated brass water jacket screws onto the crankcase, retaining the cylinder in the same manner as the standard aero head. It is stamped “E” on top. The crankcase is drilled and threaded in the exhaust areas to accept ¼ inch diameter screw-in brass tubing stubs. Presumably the cases were supplied to Ripmax in this configuration by Mills Bros. The venturi jet and intake components screw together in the usual manner. However, as the jet piece must be drilled through for air intake after assembly, it was clearly done thus at the outset, again indicating that there was no intention to fit a fuel tank to these engines. As stated previously, a completely logical concept when considering the engine’s intended use in marine service. Conclusion I hope that this article has done something to resolve a certain amount of confusion which has hitherto surrounded the Mills marine models which turn up from time to time. This is an interesting story which is well worth preserving! __________________________ Article © Maris Dislers, Glandore, South Australia First published August 2024 |
|