![]() |
The Vivell Diesels
Somewhat surprisingly given the attachment of his name to these products, Earl Vivell was not a manufacturer per se – rather, he was a hobby shop owner, an avid hands-on modeller and a business promoter. All of his offerings were manufactured for him by others. Vivell operated the engine marketing side of his business from his home at 2470 - 27th Avenue, San Francisco, California. From the standpoint of the model engine enthusiast, a point of particular interest in the Vivell story is the fact that he was the promoter of one of the ranges of model diesel engines developed in America during the early classic period. Moreover, the diesels marketed under the Vivell name were both very well made and endowed with some highly original features. I’ve mentioned the Vivell diesels in several previous articles on this website. However, I thought that it might be helpful to add a focused article on these engines to complement my other articles on American diesels. The following represents my attempt to do so. Background
Earl proceeded to advertise “A Few Small Class C Engines Left”. These were the so-called Vivell “Class C” engines which were actually the left-over Comet 35 units with a few very minor changes to distinguish them from their Comet ancestors. In this way, the Vivell line of engines was born. The “real” Vivell 35 engines appeared in 1945, continuing to be manufactured by Jack Keener with help from Jim Brown, another well-known West Coast engine man resident in Oakland. These two individuals were among the most prolific The Vivell 35 went through numerous design changes and in late 1946 was joined by the Vivell “Forty Niner”, this time a direct successor to the earlier Thermite and Little Dynamite designs of Jim Brown. This model was manufactured jointly by Jim Brown and Jack Keener. Earl Vivell was on a roll! His engine line was expanding and his hobby business was still doing very well, riding the crest of the post-war modelling boom. A Twin was added to the range and was produced in several variants. Beginning in 1948 Vivell added a line of small engines under the “Precision” heading. The first Vivell diesel, the Vivell Precision 10, was introduced locally in October 1947 and first advertised nationally in the April 1948 issue of “Air Trails”.
While researching the Vivell range for “Model Builder” magazine, the late John Pond gained the impression that although Earl clearly had national marketing ambitions, his ambitions out-ran his financial capacity. His venture was always under-capitalized, hence being unable to fund the production of the Vivell-branded engines in the kind of quantities which would be required to support a national marketing program. Moreover, while the Vivell engines were perfectly serviceable powerplants, they really didn’t offer sufficient stand-out inducement to prospective buyers to choose them over the available alternatives from the likes of Ohlsson, Atwood, Forster, Herkimer and others.
The various Vivell diesel models are covered in some detail in Volume 2 of Tim Dannels’ indispensable “American Model Engine Encyclopedia” (AMEE). In addition, the engines received some additional coverage in the late John Pond’s “Plug Sparks” column which was a feature of “Model Builder” magazine during the 1980’s. John’s comments on the Vivell .102 and .035 diesel models appeared in the August 1984 and January 1986 issues respectively. Finally, my good mate Maris Dislers wrote up a review of the Vivell 10 some years ago which was never published. Maris very generously shared this with me, allowing me to roll his comments into this article. Now, having summarized the background and acknowledged my principal sources, I’ll share what I’ve been able to learn about these unexpectedly excellent model diesels from America. The Vivell .10 diesel
The Vivell 10 diesel was marketed as the Vivell Precision 10 model. Bore and stroke of this plain bearing unit were 0.510 in. (12.95 mm) and 0.500 in. (12.70 mm) respectively for a displacement of 0.102 cuin. (1.674 cc). The original version of The engine featured a hardened steel piston operating in a steel cylinder. The instruction leaflet cited a design compression ratio of 16.25 to 1, a figure which appears to be quite compatible with the recommended fuel mixture of equal parts ether and S.A.E. 20 mineral oil. However, it appears that this compression ratio was not built into a number of examples of this model. More of this below. The cylinder port timing was relatively mild. Exhaust and transfer durations were 110 degrees and 100 degrees respectively. The disc rear rotary valve opened at around 60 degrees ABDC and closed at 20 degrees ATDC for a total induction period of 140 degrees. The one-piece steel crankshaft had a counterbalanced web. It ran in a brass-bushed main bearing. An important feature worth noting was the screwed-in front plate which used left-hand threads to keep the plate from unscrewing while the engine was running. Owners of these engines should be mindful of this thread orientation if their engines ever require dismantling for servicing.
The fixed-compression Vivell 10 diesels appear to have been somewhat undependable runners. Maris Dislers attempted to test two distinct examples, failing to extract more than a few pops from them regardless of the fuel used. This issue appeared to be down to the fact that the tested examples appeared to have fixed compression ratios that were far too low - around 10 to 1 in Maris's estimate, very much lower than the claimed 16.25 to 1 figure. At Difficulties of this kind prompted the appearance of a variable compression version of the engine soon thereafter in 1948. The contra piston was located in the head rather than in the top of the cylinder bore. The use of an Allen screw to adjust the compression was a bit problematic – a conventional tommy bar would have been greatly preferable. Bore and stroke were unchanged, but the bulkier and more complex head caused an increase in the weight to 4.23 ounces (120 gm). In order to attempt to move with the times, a glow-plug variant of this engine was also developed. However, this was not a sales success, being produced in very small numbers. A few examples of the glow-plug variant were produced with crankshaft front rotary valve induction, but these fared no better. The Motor Boys Replicas In the year 2000, the members of Motor Boys International (MBI) got together to create a number of superb replicas of the second model of the Vivell Precision 10 diesel. A detailed article describing the project was written up by the late Ron Chernich and published on his “Model Engine News” (MEN) website, where it may still be found.
The MBI version of the Vivell Precision .09 diesel followed the original very closely indeed. Sand cast case, front housing and tank top, bar stock head with internal contra piston, rear disc rotary valve induction and machined tank were all featured. The major change was the use of two transfer ports rather than the single port used in the originals. The exhaust period was also extended slightly, as was the induction period. Original engines used the previously-mentioned Allen head set screw compression adjustment arrangement, but the MB plans show either the Allen head screw or a standard tommy bar adjuster. It must be said that the tommy bar system is far more convenient to use. Larry Jenno of Las Vegas also produced a few replica Vivell 10 diesels. Like all of Larry’s work, they were produced to very high standards. Since they featured a tommy bar comp screw and a rather different carburettor/needle valve assembly, they are readily distinguishable from the originals. The Vivell 10 Diesel on Test My decision to pull together a stand-alone article on the Vivell diesels triggered a somewhat foggy memory that my good mate Maris Dislers had undertaken some testing of the Vivell 10 diesel a few years ago. My inquiry to Maris resulted in him supplying not only his test results but also the text of an unpublished article which he had written up on the engines. Treasure trove indeed! With Maris's kind permission, I was able to roll his comments into this article. I mentioned earlier that Maris had no luck at all with the original fixed-compression version of the engine despite having access to two examples to test. The recommended fuel for this variant was a standard fixed-compression mix of equal parts ether and mineral oil, but the engine simply didn't want to know, regardless of the fuel used. The problem appeared to be the result of a fixed compression ratio that was far too low - around 10 to 1 according to Maris's estimate. The best that Maris could extract was a few pops and bangs. No such problems were encountered with the variable compression model! Maris tried the engine using a more conventional fuel consisting of equal parts castor oil, ether and kerosene, with .8% EHN ignition improver added. Using this blend, the engine started easily, adjusted nicely and ran with low vibration at all speeds. The following data were recorded.
The performance curves show power topping the .1 BHP mark right across the 8,500 – 11,500 RPM range, with an indicated peak of .103 BHP at 10,300 RPM, where torque remained at almost 10 oz-in. Maximum torque of 12.6 oz-in occurred at 7,500 RPM. This is an excellent performance for a 1.6 cc diesel of 1948 vintage - it matched the measured performance of the slightly larger-displacement FROG 180 diesel of 1948, for example. It would be several years before British manufacturers developed 1.5 cc diesels which beat these figures.
The Vivell Precision 10’s performance shows the advantage of applying “next generation” design principles when compared against other contemporary American diesels. Power equalled the bulkier and heavier Micro and C.I.E. 10 models, despite those engines' 30% and 50% greater swept volumes respectively. Torque of the Vivell falls a little short of the levels developed by those two units, but peak power comes in at significantly higher RPM, which would be desirable in certain applications. Maris also sent along some notes supplied by Stan Pilgrim, one of the talented builders of a Motor Boys replica. Stan tried his Motor Boys replica using a fuel consisting of 24% castor oil, 4% Castrol A747 (a semi-synthetic 2-stroke racing oil), 35% ether and 35.5% Jet A1 (refined kerosene) plus 1.5% IPN. A 7x6 APC prop was used for initial testing. Tested on a relatively cool day, the engine was found to be capable of around 11,200 RPM on this prop with a flash to 11,400 before the main bearing seized! The engine was cleaned out and the top of the piston face was relieved slightly along with the piston skirt below the gudgeon pin bosses. The piston seal was now not as good when the engine was hot, but still more than adequate for starting and running.
Stan also tried the 7x6 APC on this fuel. The engine behaved much the same as it had done on the other fuel but achieved a slightly higher best speed of 11,200 RPM - around 0.143 BHP at this speed. It actually seemed happier when set slightly rich to run at 11,000 RPM. It appears from the results recorded by both Maris and Stan that the Motor Boys replica out-performed the original by a substantial margin. We might expect this given the replica's use of two transfer ports along with extended exhaust and induction periods. Regardless, the performance of the replica proves beyond argument that with further development, the Vivell 10 had the potential to set a standard of diesel performance in its displacement category that would not be matched for some years. The Vivell .035 diesel
A number of prototypes of this engine were tried, including examples with one and two exhaust ports respectively as well as the rather strange variant seen at the right, which featured an intake tube mounted on the side of the crankcase and timed by an induction port located peripherally on the circumference of the rotary disc. However, the design eventually adopted for production featured a conventional disc valve induction system along with conventional radial porting having three exhaust ports and three transfer ports located between them.
The mounting system was somewhat problematic – the crankcase was not provided with mounting lugs of any kind. It would have been necessary to create some kind of radial mounting ring to be secured to the rear of the case using the three machine screws provided. A clearance hole would have to be included to accommodate the rear induction tube.
Of course, by this time the American market for diesels had largely evaporated. According to John Pond, the majority of these engines ended up being exported to Europe, where sales prospects for diesels were significantly better. However, if this is so, one wonders how such an initiative escaped the attention of the Eurpopean modelling media so completely and why no advertising appears to have taken place. Moreover, where are those engines now? Almost all surviving examples show up in America rather than Europe. Personally, I'm far from convinced .......... The probable reality is that several other factors conspired to erode the engine’s sales prospects. For one thing, the somewhat awkward mounting system can’t have helped – it would have put off many prospective buyers. The absence of any advertising also wouldn't have helped. But a more serious issue was the fact that for some unexplained reason (probably cost), the engines used an unhardened Another issue reported by John Pond was the fact that the engine apparently used an aluminium alloy contra-piston which sometimes seized in the head when hot, driving the engine into over-compression mode with no ability to make a correcting adjustment. If this happened and the engine was not stopped immediately, failure of the bronze conrod due to pre-ignition could result.
The smallest Vivell glow-plug design as illustrated here has generally been cited as an .020 model, although there have been seemingly reliable reports that its actual displacement was 0.013 cuin. (0.213 cc). The cylinder diameter is certainly consistent with this figure - the engine was almost dwarfed by its standard ¼-32 Arden glow-plug! The former owner of the illustrated engine, my good mate Tim Dannels, recalled that the glow-plug threaded directly into the cylinder bore, thus forming the actual cylinder head! Since the base diameter of a ¼-32 thread is 0.2128 in. (5.405 mm), the bore couldn't have been larger than 0.2125 in. (5.35 mm). If we assume that this engine used a modified .035 diesel shaft having a stroke of 0.365 in. (9.27 mm), we get a calculated displacement of 0.0129 cuin. (0.212 cc). I'm certain that this is how the illustrated engine was constructed, confirming the cited .013 cuin. nominal displacement. I have no knowledge of any confirmed .020 cuin. examples. At the time when I prepared this article, I hadn't found an opportunity to make up a test mount for the Vivell .035 diesel. If and when I do so, I will run a series of bench tests and report the findings in an addendum to this article. Summary and Conclusion
It's undeniably true that the original fixed compression rendition of the Vivell 10 represented something of a false start. However, the addition of variable compression pretty much sorted the problems. Although the revised model ran very well as it stood, there was clearly still plenty of development potential in the design, as demonstrated by the Motor Boys renditions. If that potential had been pursued, there's little doubt that the Vivell 10 would be remembered today as one of the most remarkable diesels of its era, regardless of origin. The smaller .035 cuin. Vivell diesel had a few warts, pricipally centering upon its cylinder material and its mounting idiosyncracies. However, it too clearly had the potential to be developed into one of the better diesels of its era and displacement. So hats off to Jack Keener, Jim Brown and their mentor Earl Vivell! Between them, their efforts resulted in the manufacture of a couple of diesels of real quality and distinction. These engines and their creators are well worthy of our respectful remembrance! ___________________________ Article © Adrian C. Duncan, Coquitlam, British Columbia, Canada First published May 2024 |
|